The Telegraph’s #DLA ignorance

I could hardly believe my eyes when I read this, in an article titled (without apparent irony) “To cut with principle is the right approach“:

There will certainly be other cuts to the welfare budget. The guiding principle behind them seems to be the reintroduction of the distinction between the “deserving” and the “undeserving” poor. This is not meant to be an absolute distinction, still less one which damns those on the wrong side of it as worthless or inadequate. But it is intended to be a way of making decisions about who is entitled to the state’s resources in a time of scarcity. That is why the Coalition is going to target Disability Allowance: the aim is to force 400,000 of those claiming that benefit back into paid employment.

It is not principled to willfully confuse Disability Living Allowance with an out-of-work benefit.

It is not principled to think that “forcing” people back into paid employment is a reasonable thing to do.

And it is not principled to imply that some disabled people may form part of any “undeserving poor”.

(If you prefer your stories with a little more truth and facts in them, you may be interested in 3 posts on the topic of Disability Living Allowance we’ve written previously: 1, 2, 3.)

Advertisements

Published by

rich_w

Man of letters & numbers; also occasionally of action. Husband to NTW. Dad of three. Friendly geek.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s